Predestination and Puffery

Dear Readers,

I just had a debate over predestination and efficacious grace. After that, I still don’t see much of a difference between moderate Molinism and Banezian predestination. I wonder if it’s merely a confusion of something like a necessity of the consequent – God inspiring the will by proposing a final end to the will and God directly intending each supernatural action by supernatural grace, as He sustains every act both in existence and as supernatural by reason of the formal perfection of every supernatural act, and thus every act remains modally free even though, by necessity of the consequent, the person willing actually chooses the good. At this point, I’m not sure. I’ve still got to think more about the problem.

In the end, though, I have one thing to say:

http://www.zombo.com/

 

Yours in Christ,

Br. James Dominic, OP

 

Advertisements
  1. #1 by Raymond on February 11, 2011 - 9:09 am

    Talk about getting sucked into a Zombo-com vortex. It’s hypnotic!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: